[A. Call to Order and Roll Call]
          [00:00:09]
          ORDER OF OCTOBER 2020. OCTOBER 21ST, 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION. CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE. MR. CHRISTIE HERE, MR. DAFFERN. MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. HAYMAN. YES, MA'AM. MR. HONEYCUTT. YES, 
          [B. Approval of Minutes (September 16, 2025)]
MA'AM. FIRST ITEM IS APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER MEETING. EVERYBODY HAD A CHANCE TO LOOK AT THOSE AND REVIEW IT. YES, SIR. MOTION TO APPROVE. I WASN'T PRESENT, I COULDN'T I COULD STILL MOTION. YES. WE HAVE MOTION. SECOND, CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. CHRISTIE. YES, MA'AM. MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. HAMMOND, YES. ABSTAIN. ABSTAIN, MR. HONEYCUTT. YES, 
          [C. Announcements]
MA'AM. NEXT ITEM. ANNOUNCEMENTS. ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS? WAYNE. YES, MR. CHAIRMAN. TODAY, DURING THE REGULAR SCHEDULED MEETING, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HEARD A COUPLE ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BEFORE THIS COMMISSION IN THE PAST. THERE WAS A SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT IN LAND AND ZONE CHANGE AT 1141 NORTH TYNDALL PARKWAY. THAT REQUEST WAS TO GO FROM RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND FROM R2 AND C2 TO C3 ZONING, THAT BOTH THOSE REQUESTS WERE APPROVED. 
          AND THEN THERE WERE THERE WAS REQUEST TO CHANGE SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THE BOARD VOTED TO TABLE THAT TO THE NEXT MEETING FOR SOME FURTHER DISCUSSION. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEM 
          [D. Agenda – Additions, Deletions, Changes and Acceptance ]
ON THE AGENDA. ANY DELETIONS OR CHANGES TO THE AGENDA? I HAVE ONE MINOR REVISION. NOT SO MUCH TO THE AGENDA, BUT TO THE ITEMS INCLUDED. STAFF MADE SOME LAST MINUTE REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 29, THE REVISIONS. THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT YOU RECEIVED IN YOUR ORIGINAL PACKET. WE'VE MADE COPIES AND PROVIDED THOSE CHANGES TO YOU ON PAGE 29. DASH 23 TOP THERE, SECTION 2918. THOSE THOSE REVISIONS THAT WERE MADE YESTERDAY ARE HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW. YEAH. AGENDA. SECOND WITH THE I'M SORRY, I'M SORRY. SECOND THAT WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND CALL THE ROLL PLEASE, MR. CHRISTIE. YES, MA'AM. MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. HAYMAN. 
          [E. Public Hearings (Swear in for quasi-judicial)]
YES, MA'AM. MR. HUNNICUTT. YES, MA'AM. THE NEXT ITEM IS THE. WE'RE HERE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARINGS. IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS, YOU'LL NEED TO STAND AND BE SWORN IN. PLEASE, IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK, YOU'LL NEED TO STAND AND BE SWORN IN. AS. YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND, DO YOU SOLEMNLY SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE EVIDENCE YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE IS THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? OKAY. AND WHEN YOU COME TO THE PODIUM, WE NEED YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS WHEN YOU COME UP HERE. SO FIRST, PUBLIC HEARING COMMISSION CONDUCT A QUASI JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING, PLEASE. CUP 20250186 TO CONSIDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ALLOW MANUFACTURED HOME ON A PROPERTY WITH AN R-1 ZONING DESIGNATION. PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 8729 EAST BAY HEAD COURT IN YOUNGSTOWN AREA, IN EX PARTE COMMUNICATION. NO, SIR. 
          NONE. NONE FOR ME. STAFF PRESENTATION WAYNE PORTER. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. AS STATED, THIS IS A REQUEST TO ALLOW THE PLACEMENT OF A MANUFACTURED HOME ON A PARCEL WITH A SINGLE FAMILY R-1 ZONING DESIGNATION. PROJECT LOCATION IS 8729 EAST BAY HEAD COURT IN THE YOUNGSTOWN AREA. CHAPTER FOUR, SECTION FOUR 404 OF THE BAY COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS LIST THE ALLOWABLE USES IN THE R-1 ZONING DESIGNATION. A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS BUILT TO FLORIDA. BUILDING CODE STANDARDS. HOME OFFICES OF CONVENIENCE COMMUNITY FACILITIES. FAMILY DAYCARE HOMES, NON-FOR-PROFIT PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS. LOW IMPACT UTILITIES, HOME OCCUPATIONS AND ONE NON NON NON-HABITABLE STRUCTURE. THE PROPOSED USE IS NOT IDENTIFIED AS AN ALLOWABLE USE IN THE R-1 ZONING DISTRICT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD WITH A BALANCED MIX OF SINGLE FAMILY AND MANUFACTURED HOMES. THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED SIMILAR REQUESTS IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD IN 2018, 2020 AND 2024. THE PROPERTY, LOCATED DIRECTLY TO THE SOUTH, WAS APPROVED FOR A CUP TO PLACE A MANUFACTURED HOME ON JULY 16TH, 2024. STAFF FEELS THAT THE PROPOSED USE WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND WILL NOT CREATE A NUISANCE FOR THE SURROUNDING LAND USES. IT'S THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONDUCT THE PUBLIC HEARING, FINALLY, PROPOSE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE 
          [00:05:03]
PERMIT REQUEST BASED ON THE ATTACHED FINDINGS. WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THIS ITEM, AND I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. OKAY, OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS? ANYBODY QUESTIONS OKAY. THANK YOU WAYNE. THIS TIME WE'LL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT IF THE APPLICANT IS HERE. MR. NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. FREDDY RESTO 6224 BOBBY LANE, PANAMA CITY. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD TO WHAT? WAYNE? NO, JUST. OKAY. YOU DON'T HAVE TO SPEAK IF YOU DON'T. YEAH. I'M SORRY, I'M NOT. THAT'S OKAY, THAT'S OKAY. NO PROBLEM. NO WORRIES, NO WORRIES. WE JUST APPRECIATE YOU SHOWING UP. THANK YOU. YEAH. THIS TIME WE'LL MOVE TO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WANTS TO SPEAK ON THIS? ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC? I GUESS WE'LL GO TO COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION. PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. THERE'S. I MEAN, THERE'S MOBILE HOMES, I THINK, ACROSS THE STREET AND. I WOULD, I WOULD ASK THE RECOMMENDATION. SECOND, WE HAVE MOTION. SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION. 
          YES, SIR. CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. CHRISTIE. YES, MA'AM. MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. HAMMOND. 
          YES, MR. HONEYCUTT? YES, MA'AM. OKAY. SEE, THAT WAS EASY. THANK YOU. NEXT ITEM, THE COMMISSION TO CONDUCT A QUASI JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING. PLD 2025019 FOUR AND PLS CA 20250193 TO CONSIDER REQUEST TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. APPROXIMATELY 0.7 ACRES FROM RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND CHANGE THE ZONING FROM R-3, DUPLEX, TRIPLEX AND QUADRUPLEX TO C3. A GENERAL COMMERCIAL LOW PRIORITY PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2815 EAST 15TH STREET IN UNINCORPORATED PANAMA CITY. ANY EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION. NO. NONE FOR ME. 
          STAFF PRESENTATION. BLAIR. SAUNDERS. ALL RIGHT. BLAIR. GOOD AFTERNOON. AS YOU JUST DESCRIBED, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF 0.68 ACRES OF RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL. THE APPLICANT HAS ALSO REQUESTED TO CHANGE THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY FROM R-3. DUPLEX TRIPLEX TO C3, A GENERAL COMMERCIAL LOW ZONE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2815 EAST 15TH STREET IN UNINCORPORATED PANAMA CITY AREA. AS I SAID BEFORE, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON A CORRIDOR ALONG THE 15TH STREET THAT IS PREDOMINANTLY COMPRISED OF GENERAL COMMERCIAL, LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS. EAST 15TH STREET IS DESIGNATED AS A MAJOR ARTERIAL ROADWAY IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT. 
          ADDITIONALLY, AERIAL IMAGERY INDICATES THAT THE PROPERTY HAS HAD A COMMERCIAL USE OF AT LEAST SINCE 1999, AND THE PROPERTY DIMENSIONS CURRENTLY MEET THE BOLT REGULATIONS OF TABLE 6.1. STAFF FEEL THAT THE THE REQUESTED AMENDMENT IS COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. THEREFORE, WE RECOMMEND THAT THE COMMISSION FIND THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE BAY COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE MAP CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. 
          FIND PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND THEN FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGE AND ZONE CHANGE. I'VE HAD ONE PHONE CALL ABOUT THE PROPERTY AND THEY JUST ASSUMED THAT IT WAS ALWAYS COMMERCIAL, SO THEY WERE KIND OF CONFUSED ON WHY. SO IT SEEMS LIKE EVERYBODY'S SEES IT AS COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. OKAY. 
          QUESTIONS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YEAH. CURIOSITY IS JUST THE CLIENT USE IT. OH YEAH. THERE'S ALWAYS FOR 99. SO JUST NO NO NOT TO YOU. YEAH YEAH THAT'S CORRECT. IT'S BEEN A NON-CONFORMING A LEGAL NON-CONFORMING USE SINCE THEN. AND THANK YOU BLAIR. AT THIS TIME IT'S FOR THE APPLICANT IF THE APPLICANT HERE TO SPEAK. HEY, MY NAME IS KYLE. 826 BREAKFAST POINT BOULEVARD, PANAMA CITY BEACH. TO ADD TO YOUR TO YOUR QUESTION, THE. I JUST PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO, AND IT WAS MY SAME SURPRISE THAT IT'S BECAUSE IT WAS SOLD AS COMMERCIAL AND THE PREVIOUS OWNERS HAD THE BUSINESS THERE, LIKE THE PORTABLE BUILDINGS AND THEN CAR LOTS AND ALL KIND OF STUFF. SO AFTER I PURCHASED IT, I TRIED TO LEASE IT TO A ANOTHER CAR LOT, AND THEY CAME TO GET THE DEALER LICENSE AND THEY SAID IT'S NOT COMMERCIAL. SO THAT'S HOW IT ALL STARTED. SO THAT'S PRETTY MUCH IT. OKAY. 
          [00:10:05]
AND ANOTHER QUESTION. SO IS THERE LIKE TWO COMMISSIONS THAT NEEDS TO BE PASSED ON THIS PROPERTY LIKE THIS ONE. AND THEN ANOTHER ONE. YES. WE MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. IF WE IF WE DO GO WITH IT, AND THEN THE COUNTY COMMISSION WOULD VOTE ON IT A MONTH FROM NOW, OR GIVE OR TAKE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. THIS TIME WE'LL OPEN UP TO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WANT TO SPEAK ON THIS ONE HERE, WE'LL MOVE ON TO COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION. BUT WE'RE CORRECTING SOMETHING HERE. YEAH, YEAH. MATTER OF FACT, THE ONE TO THE EAST OF IT IS SOON. IT'LL COME IN HERE FOR SOME AT SOME POINT. YEAH. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ADOPT STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FORWARD IT TO THE COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL. SO WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? OKAY. CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. CHRISTIE. YES, MA'AM. MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. HAYMAN. 
          YES, MA'AM. MR. HONEYCUTT. YES, MA'AM. MOTION CARRIES. OKAY, WE'LL GO TO THE NEXT ITEM, THE COMMISSION, AND CONDUCT A LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING. P.L. 20250196 TO CONSIDER A REQUEST TO REVISE CHAPTERS 13 1829 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THE PROPOSED REVISIONS INCLUDE CHANGES TO REGULATIONS, THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS, NEW LANGUAGE REGARDING SMALL SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT, STAFF PRESENTATION WAYNE PORTER THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. STAFF IS PROPOSING SOME TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THREE CHAPTERS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THE REVISION TO CHAPTER 13 PROVIDES LANGUAGE TO ALLOW FOR OFFENSE UP TO EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT WITHIN TEN FEET OF THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE FOR INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES. THE REVISIONS TO CHAPTER TO CHAPTER 18 REVISES LANGUAGE REGARDING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIMEFRAMES TO BE CONSISTENT WITH NEW STATE REGULATIONS. THERE'S ALSO LANGUAGE TO EXEMPT SUBDIVISIONS FROM THE LIGHTING PLAN REQUIREMENTS. THE REVISIONS. 
          CHAPTER 29 INCLUDE LANGUAGE THAT REVISES LOT SPLIT REGULATION. THERE IS ALSO NEW LANGUAGE PROVIDED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL SUBDIVISIONS. ADDITIONALLY, AN OMITTED FROM YOUR STAFF REPORT AND I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT. THERE'S LANGUAGE THAT ADDRESSES THE NEW STATE REGULATIONS REGARDING PLAT RECORDATION AND REVIEW SUBDIVISION, PLAT RECORDATION AND REVIEW. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE COMMISSION CONDUCT A LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS. WE'VE HAD NO PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THIS ITEM SINCE IT'S BEEN PUBLICLY NOTICED. I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. SO WHEN WE IF WE VOTE TO TO FORWARD THIS, THEN IT NEEDS TO BE WITH REVISIONS AS PROVIDED TODAY. 
          THAT'S THE REQUEST FROM STAFF. OKAY. DARREN, YOU SAID YOU HAD SOME COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS. 
          FALLS TO THE NEXT ONE OKAY. YEAH OKAY OKAY. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING. SO ALL RIGHT WE NEED A MOTION. MOTION. I'LL SECOND WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION FOR THE RECORD THIS IS FOR THE REVISED PACKET PROVIDED TODAY. IT'S CALLED ROLL PLEASE, MR. CHRISTIE. YES, MA'AM. MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. HAMMOND. YES, MA'AM. MR. HONEYCUTT. YES, MA'AM. MOTION CARRIES. NEXT, ITEM NUMBER FOUR. THE COMMISSIONER CONDUCT A LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING. PL PT 20250207 TO CONSIDER REVISE CHAPTER TWO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT AND CHAPTER THREE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE FOUNTAIN RURAL COMMUNITY ON PROPERTIES WITH A COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. STAFF PRESENTATION WAYNE PORTER. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. AGAIN. THE PROPOSED REVISIONS PROVIDE LANGUAGE TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE FOUNTAIN RURAL COMMUNITY ON PROPERTIES WITH A COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. CURRENTLY, OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROHIBITS RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN COMMERCIAL ZONINGS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF WITHIN THE BEACH AND SPECIAL TREATMENT ZONE. THIS LANGUAGE WAS PROPOSED TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE FOUNTAIN RURAL COMMUNITY SPECIAL ZONE AS WELL. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE COMMISSION CONDUCT A LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS. AMENDMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS. AGAIN, WE'VE HAD NO PUBLIC COMMENT ON THESE ISSUES, AND I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. I DIDN'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH IT. SO AND I JUST REALIZED THE QUESTIONS I HAD TO PROTECT. I 
          [00:15:02]
CAN ASK. NOT A BIG DEAL. WE CAN GO AHEAD AND DO THIS. I'LL ASK YOU ABOUT IT AFTERWARDS. 
          MULLIGAN. YEAH, YEAH. BACK UP. ALL RIGHT. ANY NEED A MOTION? MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND, WE HAVE MOTION. SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? OKAY. CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. CHRISTIE. YES, MA'AM. MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. HAYMAN. YES, MA'AM. MR. HONEYCUTT. YES, MA'AM. MOTION. 
          [F. Commission Member Items ]
NEXT ITEM IS COMMISSION MEMBER ITEMS. I THINK MR. HARMON HAS A ITEM. YEAH, I. SO JUST SO NOW IT'S JUST FOR DISCUSSION OR FOR CURIOSITY. SO I THINK IT'S ON 18 FOR JUST FOR APPROVING OR DENYING APPLICATION. IT JUMPED FROM IT WAS 30 TO 120 DAYS. IT JUST SEEMS LIKE A BIG STRETCH OF TIME. AND I WAS JUST CURIOUS WHY THAT WAS TO. YEAH. SO THIS IS MIRRORING LANGUAGE THAT CAME FROM SENATE BILL 1080. THAT WAS A WENT TO EFFECT IN JULY FOR THIS MIRRORS THAT. YES. OKAY. 
          AND IT CLEARS UP SOME OF THE LANGUAGE I THINK THAT THERE WAS THE LANGUAGE THAT WE HAD PREVIOUSLY WAS A LITTLE BIT CONFUSING. WHILE WE HAD 30 DAYS. IT SAID THE PLANNING OFFICIALS APPROVE OR DENY ANY APPLICATION WITHIN 30 WORKING DAYS AFTER THE DATE THE APPLICATION IS RECEIVED. THAT WASN'T EXACTLY THE PROCESS. WE HAD 30 DAYS OR 20 DAYS PREVIOUSLY TO REVIEW THAT APPLICATION TO DETERMINE IF IT WAS COMPLETE OR NOT, AND THEN WE WOULD PROVIDE THE APPLICANT WITH THE THE LIST OF ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. SO WHAT THIS DOES IS KIND OF CORRECTS THAT CONFUSION. AND INSTEAD OF SAYING IDENTIFYING 30 DAYS AS THE. AMOUNT OF DAYS, WE HAVE TO EITHER DENY THE APPLICATION OR APPROVE IT, IT IT REFLECTS THE STATE'S REQUIREMENT OF 120 DAYS. THAT DOESN'T MEAN THE APPLICANT HAS TO BE HAVE THE APPLICATION COMPLETE WITHIN 120 DAYS. IF IF THEY WERE STILL REVIEWING IT, WE WOULD WE WOULD CONTINUE REVIEWING SUBMITTALS AS LONG AS THE APPLICANT IS PARTICIPATING IN PROVIDING THOSE SUBMITTALS AND KEEP THAT REVIEW GOING. PERIOD. SHOULDN'T SLOW THE PROCESS DOWN THAT MUCH. BUT NO, NO, IT GIVES IT GIVES STAFF A BIT MORE TIME TO DO THE INITIAL REVIEW. ORIGINALLY THE INITIAL REVIEW WE WE COMPLETED IN 20 BUSINESS DAYS. THE STATE IS NOW ALLOWING US 30 FOR THAT INITIAL REVIEW TO GET THAT INITIAL REVIEW COMPLETE. OKAY. AND THEN THE OTHER ONE I HAD A QUESTION ABOUT WAS ON 2918, NUMBER 12, IT WAS JUST ABOUT NO DEVELOPER, OWNER OR AGENT SHALL SELL OR OTHERWISE TRANSFER ANY INTEREST IN ANY LAND IN A SUBDIVISION PRIOR TO THE RECORDING OF THE PLAT, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SECTION. SO I JUST, I JUST THOUGHT IT WAS ODD THAT YOU COULDN'T CONVEY A PROPERTY OR AN INTEREST IN A PROPERTY, OR A PORTION OF INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY, SO THAT WAS RECORDED. I JUST DIDN'T KNOW IF THAT. I WAS JUST CURIOUS AS TO WHY. SO THAT LANGUAGE WAS PROVIDED TO US BY OUR COUNTY ATTORNEY. SO IT KIND OF DOESN'T MATTER. YEAH. 
          SO THIS IS ALL OF THIS WAS DICTATED BY THAT, RIGHT? OKAY. I DON'T KNOW THAT BEFORE THIS LANGUAGE THAT THAT WE PERMITTED A DEVELOPER TO SELL A PLATTED LOT THAT WAS NOT YET PLATTED. 
          YEAH, YEAH, YEAH. AND IT'S AND IT WAS REALLY MORE ABOUT I DIDN'T KNOW IF THAT WOULD JUST RESTRICT IF YOU HAD A PARTNERSHIP AND THERE WERE PERCENTAGE OF OWNERSHIP AND IT WOULD, MIGHT RESTRICT SOMEBODY FROM DOING THAT, BUT I GUESS IT'S NOT. I MIGHT BE OVERTHINKING IT. I JUST THAT WAS THE ONLY THING THAT JUST STOOD OUT. SO IS IT YOUR OPINION THAT I'M OVERTHINKING IT? WAYNE, I THINK YOU MIGHT BE OVERTHINKING. I'M GOING TO HAVE TO DEFER TO MR. LIEBER, MAYBE TO HELP ANSWER THAT QUESTION. I DON'T KNOW THAT IT CHANGES PROCESS WE HAVE NOW IN PLACE THAT MUCH. IT'S JUST IT'S KIND OF CODIFYING WHAT? WHAT THE PRACTICE IS NOW. YEAH. IF I'M BEING COMPLETELY HONEST, THIS IS JUST A SMOKESCREEN TO MAKE YOU THINK THAT I'VE READ EVERYTHING AND. I ACTUALLY DID READ IT. ONE OTHER THING. HOW DOES THANKSGIVING DOESN'T AFFECT US? OKAY, OKAY. NO, I AM GOING TO PUT SOMETHING ON THE MEETING FOR YOU GUYS NEXT MONTH, SINCE DECEMBER WILL HAVE TO REVIEW THE DATES FOR 2026. AND I HAVE PULLED THE BAY COUNTY CALENDAR FOR SPRING BREAK. SO SOMETHING I WAS GOING TO PUT FORWARD TO YOU NEXT MONTH IS TO PONDER MOVING MARCH 17TH. IF IT'S GOING TO INTERFERE. 
          [00:20:01]
SOMETIMES IT DOES. OKAY. THESE ARE I GOT A COUPLE YEARS AWAY FROM SPRING BREAK, SO. OKAY. 
          YEAH, SPRING BREAKS EVERY DAY FOR HIM RIGHT NOW. GOTCHA. I'LL BE GONE. BUT MAYBE BRIAN. BUT SINCE BRIAN WASN'T HERE, I WAS GOING TO PUT IT ON THE AGENDA FOR NEXT MONTH AS A DISCUSSION ITEM FOR YOU GUYS. BUT LOOK AT YOUR CALENDARS AND SO YOU CAN KNOW WHAT YOU'RE UP AGAINST WHEN WE TALK ABOUT IT. WHEN'S THE NOVEMBER MEETING? NOVEMBER IS. 18TH, SO IT'S THE WEEK BEFORE. THAT'S RIGHT. YEP. OKAY. I'VE GOT THINGS LINED UP ALREADY. WE'VE ALREADY HAD STUFF FOR THE NOVEMBER MEETING. OKAY. YEAH. THAT'S GOOD, THAT'S GOOD. I WILL NOT BE HERE FOR THE NOVEMBER MEETING. WILL BE. MR. CURLING WILL BE TAKING MY PLACE. REALLY? YEAH. WOW. AND NEAL HEFTY DOING SOME STUFF. SO THAT'LL BE IT, WON'T BLAIR TO HANDLE IT. DRAW HIM DOWN FROM HIS IVORY TOWER. YES. OKAY.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.