[A. Call to Order and Roll Cal] [00:00:06] YEAH. WE'RE GOING TO CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER ON NOVEMBER 18TH, 2025. BAY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. CHRISTIE. YES, MA'AM. MR. DAFFERN. YES, MA'AM. [B. Approval of Minutes (October 21, 2025)] MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. HAYMAN. YES, MA'AM. MR. HONEYCUTT. YES, MA'AM. FIRST ITEM IS APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM THE OCTOBER 21ST MEETING. ANYBODY HAD A CHANCE TO LOOK AT THOSE? AND ANY CHANGES? MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND, WE HAVE MOTION. SECOND, CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. CHRISTIE. YES, MA'AM. MR. DAFFERN. YES, MA'AM. MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. [C. Announcements] HAYMAN. YES, MA'AM. MR. HONEYCUTT. YES, MA'AM. NEXT ITEM. ANNOUNCEMENTS. WELL, JUST TO LET EVERYONE KNOW THIS IS NOT WAYNE PORTER. HE'S STILL FINISHING UP HIS VACATION IN ITALY. SO I'M IAN CRAWLEY, I'M THE DIRECTOR FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, AND I DID THIS FOR 15, 20 YEARS. AND I'M HAPPY TO STEP IN AND HELP. WE HAVE THREE ITEMS. GO BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THIS MORNING THAT GOT APPROVED THE ITEM ON 15TH STREET THAT YOU GUYS HEARD LAST MONTH, THE CAR DEALERSHIP PROPERTY THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD. THEY ALSO APPROVED THE PUD FOR TITUS PARK PHASE FOUR, BASICALLY THE SAME KIND OF PAD THAT THEY'VE BEEN DOING FOR PARKS, PHASES ONE, TWO AND THREE. AND THEN THOSE ITEMS FOR THE LDR CHAPTERS CHANGES TO CHAPTER 13, CHAPTER 18 AND CHAPTER 29 WERE ALSO APPROVED. THAT WAS ALREADY APPROVED. SO EVERYTHING IS IN THERE AS THE LAW OF THE LAND NOW, RIGHT? YES. OKAY. AS SOON AS WE AS SOON AS WE UPDATE THE BOOKS. BUT YES, IF THE LAW BORN. OKAY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. GOOD. [D. Agenda – Additions, Deletions, Changes and Acceptance] ALL RIGHT. WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE AGENDA. ANY ADDITIONS, CHANGES, DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA. SO ITEM THREE ON THE AGENDA. THIS IS THE ITEM UP IN SOUTHPORT AT 7830 LIBERTY AVENUE AND 70 1737 SECOND STREET. THAT ITEM HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN BY THE APPLICANT. GO AHEAD AND REMOVE THAT FROM YOUR AGENDA. ARE THEY COMING BACK NEXT MONTH OR WHAT'S. DON'T KNOW OKAY. YEAH OKAY I DON'T I DON'T BELIEVE THAT. I DON'T BELIEVE THAT'S THE ISSUE. SO TIMING ISSUE. IT WAS JUST A NOT NOT PROPOSING THAT CHANGE OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. SO WE NEED A MOTION WITH THE AMENDED AGENDA. SO MOVED. SECOND WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND CALL THE ROLL PLEASE, MR. CHRISTIE. YES, MA'AM. MR. DAFFERN YES, MA'AM. MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. HAYMAN. YES, [E. Public Hearings (Swear in for quasi-judicial)] MA'AM. MR. HENNIGAN. YES, MA'AM. THE NEXT ITEM ARE THE PUBLIC HEARINGS. IF YOU'RE HERE TO IF YOU'RE HERE, THE PUBLIC HEARING AND YOU'RE ON THE. WE'VE GOT YOUR ITEM. YOU NEED TO STAND AND BE SWORN UP AND STAND AND BE SWORN IN. AND WHEN YOU SPEAK, YOU NEED TO COME TO THE PODIUM. GET YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. SO IF YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK, YOU NEED TO STAND AND BE SWORN IN. ELSE IS GOING TO BE SPEAKING ON ANY OF THE ITEMS. SOLEMNLY SWEAR THAT THE EVIDENCE YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE IS THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. WHEN YOU COME TO THE PODIUM, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME, YOUR ADDRESS, AND THE FACT THAT YOU WERE SWORN IN. ITEM. FIRST ITEM IS ITEM NUMBER ONE. THE COMMISSION TO CONDUCT A QUASI JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING. APPEAL. VAR 20250219. TO CONSIDER A REQUEST TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO THE FRONT BUILDING SETBACK FROM 20FT TO 14FT TWO INCHES. PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 91 GULF VIEW DRIVE AND UNINCORPORATED PANAMA CITY BEACH AREA. ANY EX-PARTE. COMMUNICATION. ANYONE? NO. NONE FOR ME. STAFF. PRESENTATION. HOPE. STUART. GOOD AFTERNOON. HOPE. STUART. BAY COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING. THIS IS PL V 2025 0219A VARIANCE REQUEST. THE MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK REQUIREMENT TO BE REDUCED FROM 20FT TO 14FT TWO INCHES ON A PROPERTY WITH AN R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING. THE ADDRESS IS 91 GULF VIEW DRIVE IN THE UNINCORPORATED PANAMA CITY BEACH AREA. CURRENTLY, THE PROPERTY IS UNDEVELOPED VACANT LAND. THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO REDUCE A REDUCTION IN THE FRONT SETBACK, STATING THAT THE IRREGULAR, ROUNDED SHAPE OF THE CORNER LOT PLACES UNUSUAL CONSTRAINTS ON DESIGNING A REASONABLE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. STAFF AGREES THAT THE IRREGULAR SHAPE OF THE LOT IS RESTRICTIVE AND PRESENTS A HARDSHIP. IT'S THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE THE VARIANCE REQUEST BASED ON THE ATTACHED FINDINGS. I'VE RECEIVED. NO. CORRESPONDENCE OR COMMENTS ON THIS PERSONALLY. SO THE 14 TWO IS ON THE SIDE ROAD, NOT ON THE THE ON THE GULF VIEW DRIVE, THE FRONT SETBACK. SO THE SIDE SETBACK IS GULF VIEW THE NORTH SOUTH. THE EAST WEST WHERE IT'S CURVED IS WHERE THEY'RE REQUESTING THE REDUCED SETBACK. SO THE STRUCTURE WOULD [00:05:05] BE FACING SOUTH. AND THAT'S WHERE THEY'RE REQUESTING THE REDUCTION OKAY. AND SETBACK OKAY. THANK YOU. THIS TIME WE'LL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT. IS THE APPLICANT HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS. APPLICANT IS NOT HERE. OKAY. THEN WE'LL MOVE ON TO PUBLIC COMMENT. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WANT TO COMMENT ON THIS? ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC? SO WE'LL CLOSE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION I GUESS. GO STRAIGHT INTO COMMISSION DISCUSSION. AND THIS IS A TIGHT LOT. IT'S YOU KNOW, IT'S YOU GOT TO. AND WHEN I LOOK AT THE SITE PLAN, IT LOOKS LIKE THE ON THE CURVE THAT IT'S NOT GOING TO DIMINISH ANY LINE OF SIGHT. SO I DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH IT I DON'T EITHER. YEAH YEAH I AGREE. MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND WE HAVE MOTION. SECOND ANY DISCUSSION OKAY. CALL THE ROLL PLEASE MR. CHRISTIE. YES, MA'AM. MR. DAFFERN. YES, MA'AM. MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. HAYMAN. YES, MA'AM. MR. HONEYCUTT. YES, MA'AM. NEXT ITEM, THE COMMISSION CONDUCT A QUASI JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING. PLD 20250235. IN PLC 20250234 TO CONSIDER REQUEST TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE FROM RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM R-2 SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEX TO C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD. COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES LOCATED 9104 LAIRD STREET IN UNINCORPORATED PANAMA CITY BEACH AREA. ANY. EX-PARTE. ANYONE? NO. NONE. NONE FOR ME. STAFF PRESENTATION. HOPE, STUART. GOOD AFTERNOON. THIS IS HOPE. STUART. BAY COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING. THIS IS P.L. 2025 0235 AND PLSC 2025 0234. APPLICATIONS FOR A SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING CHANGE. AS WELL, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND ZONING FROM R-2 SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEX DWELLINGS TO C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. LOCATED AT 9104 LAIRD STREET IN THE UNINCORPORATED PANAMA CITY BEACH AREA. SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN AN AREA WITH A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES, WITH THE PROPERTIES TO THE IMMEDIATE NORTH AND WEST ALREADY BEING THE DESIRED NEIGHBORHOOD. COMMERCIAL C-1 ZONING. THE. THE PARCEL MEETS THE MINIMUM BULK REGULATION STANDARDS, AND LAIRD STREET IS A COLLECTOR ROAD MEETING THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS WELL. THERE IS AN ACTIVE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT ORDER ALLOWING FOR FOUR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ON THE PROPERTY. THE STATED DESIRE OF THE CURRENT APPLICANT FOR THE LAND USE AND ZONING CHANGE IS TO BUILD A TOWNHOME STYLE DEVELOPMENT. THEY NEED THE C-1 TO ALLOW FOR TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENTS, AS OPPOSED TO A SINGLE FAMILY OR DUPLEX STYLE DWELLING AS WOULD BE. THE R2 WOULD LIMIT THEM TO THAT. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE REQUESTED AMENDMENT IS COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. IT'S THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT THE COMMISSION FIND THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT APPLICATION CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. FIND THE ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION CONSISTENT WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONE CHANGE REQUEST. WE DID RECEIVED TWO EMAILS FIRST THING THIS MORNING IN OPPOSITION, MOSTLY CONCERNED WITH THE. DEVELOPMENT BEING COMMERCIAL IN NATURE. AGAIN, AS I STATED, THE STATED APPLICANT STATED DESIRE OF THE APPLICATION IS TO HAVE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON SITE. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS? OKAY. THIS TIME WE'LL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? GOOD AFTERNOON GENTLEMEN I AM BRIAN LAKE WITH STARS PROPERTIES AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICE GROUP. I YOU NEED MY ADDRESS. 653 WEST 23RD STREET, SUITE 124. PANAMA CITY WERE SWORN IN. YES. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, SO THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT, WE REALLY JUST WANT TO COMPLETE THAT PINK SQUARE. IT LOOKS REALLY BAD JUST HAVING US CUT OUT LIKE THAT. REALLY THIS DEVELOPMENT WE'RE LOOKING TO DO RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL BUILD FOR TOWNHOMES. WE'RE LOOKING AT TEN TOWNHOME UNITS ON THAT PROPERTY AND REDEVELOPING. SO WE'RE WE'RE LOOKING TO IT'S WE'RE WE'RE [00:10:03] WE'RE PUTTING IT KIND OF AS AFFORDABLE LUXURY. SO THESE ARE THESE ARE A LITTLE UPSCALE TOWNHOMES BUT A LITTLE BIT LOWER THAN THE PRICE POINT THAT PANAMA CITY BEACH TYPICALLY TYPICALLY DRIVES. WE'RE IN THE LOW FOURS. SO THAT'S THAT'S WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT DOING WITH THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY. BUT IN ORDER TO GET THAT THAT DENSITY, WE NEEDED THE C-1 ZONING FOR THE TOWNHOMES. WE LOOKED AT PUTTING DUPLEXES ON THE PROPERTY, BUT TO HAVE A DECENT SIZED DUPLEX WITH THE RIGHT SQUARE FOOTAGE, IT JUST WAS NOT GOING TO WORK WITH THE WITH THE R-2 ZONING, BECAUSE WE'D ONLY BE ABLE TO PUT THREE UNITS, THREE UNITS ON THE PROPERTY. BUT SO WE THAT IS THAT IS BASICALLY WHAT WE'RE WHAT WE'RE LOOKING TO DO WITH IT. I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THAT. I'M GOOD. THANK YOU. YEAH OKAY. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. THIS TIME WE'LL MOVE TO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WANT TO SPEAK ON THIS? ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WANT TO SPEAK ON THIS? ALL RIGHT. WE'LL CLOSE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. AND, IAN, CAN YOU JUST DO THE AERIAL PHOTO? THE CHARACTER OF THE NATURE OF THE SUBDIVISION. I THINK IT CREATES A GOOD TRANSITION BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL AND THE OTHER HOMES. SURE, I AGREE. SAID THIS, MR. TAYLOR, THAT HE MAILED THIS EMAIL TO YOU. IT WAS HIS CONCERN WAS MORE OF A TRADITIONAL COMMERCIAL SERVICE RETAIL TYPE DEVELOPMENT AS OPPOSED TO A CAME IN TOO LATE. FIRST ONE I EMAILED TO YOU. SO THERE WERE TWO CONCERNS. BASICALLY. YES. SO THEY WERE CONCERNED OF WHAT COULD BE PUT THERE. COMMERCIAL. UNDERSTOOD. YEAH. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT. MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND, WE HAVE MOTION TO APPROVE, A MOTION TO APPROVE. AND A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION. CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. CHRISTIE. YES, MA'AM. YES, MA'AM. MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. HAMMOND. YES, MA'AM. MR. HONEYCUTT. YES, MA'AM. NEXT ITEM. WE'RE NOT DOING NUMBER THREE. NEXT ITEM IS NUMBER FOUR. THE COMMISSION TO CONDUCT A LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING. PLD 20250222 TO CONSIDER REQUEST TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. APPROXIMATELY 110 ACRES FROM CONSERVATION, HABITATION AND RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1350014311 ARLINGTON ROAD IN THE SANDY CREEK AREA. STAFF PRESENTATION. WAYNE IAN PORTER. GOOD CATCH. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. AS YOU STATED, THIS IS A LARGE SCALE AMENDMENT. OFTENTIMES WE KIND OF HEAR OUR SMALL SCALES IN ZONES AT THE SAME TIME. BUT SINCE THIS ONE WILL HAVE TO GET SENT UP TO THE STATE, WE'RE GOING TO KEEP THE HEARING SEPARATE. THIS IS A LARGE SCALE AMENDMENT DEALING WITH 110 ACRES. AS YOU CAN SEE THERE ON THE PROPERTY DOWN IN THE ALLENTOWN AREA, RIGHT NEXT TO THE ALLENTOWN SHIPYARD. THERE. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO CHANGE THIS LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM RESIDENTIAL AND CONSERVATION HABITATION TO INDUSTRIAL. OF COURSE, THE INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION ALLOWS FOR INDUSTRIAL PARKS, COMMERCE, PARKS, COMMERCIAL OFFICE, RENEWABLE ENERGY FACILITIES, AND OTHER SIMILAR USES. PROPERTIES. LOCATED DIRECTLY EAST OF TWO PARCELS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 126 ACRES. THERE TO THE TO THE WEST THAT CURRENTLY HAVE THAT INDUSTRIAL FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. THE APPLICANT STATES THAT SUFFICIENT INFRASTRUCTURE IS ALREADY THERE AND UTILITY SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT THE EXPANSION OF THAT EXISTING INDUSTRIAL USE. AGAIN, PROPERTY IS MOSTLY IN AN UNDEVELOPED, SPARSELY POPULATED AREA WHERE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IS ALREADY LIMITED TO TWO UNITS PER ACRE. THE REQUEST DOES NOT POSE A THREAT TO HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE COMMISSION FIND THE PROPOSED LARGE SCALE AMENDMENT TO THE BAY COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE MAP, CONSISTENT WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION ONTO THE BOARD TO APPROVE THAT AMENDMENT AND SEND IT UP FOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE FOR THEIR REVIEW. I'M HAPPY TO HELP ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. I DO SEE THE APPLICANT HERE TO HELP ANSWER QUESTIONS TO. THANK YOU. OKAY. THIS TIME WE'D LIKE TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? RON ROGERS, 5200 NELSON STREET. ON BEHALF OF EASTERN, I JUST CAME TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU GUYS MIGHT HAVE. WHAT'S THE I GUESS WHAT'S THE IDEA HERE? ARE THEY JUST. IS IT JUST MORE OF AN EXPANSION OF THE SHIPYARD ITSELF OR. WELL, IF YOU IF YOU GO TO AN AERIAL, HISTORICALLY [00:15:01] THAT AREA HAS BEEN USED AS A STORAGE AREA FOR THE SHIPYARD. SO IT WAS REALLY KIND OF JUST JUST LIKE A CLEANUP TO KIND OF GO BACK. AND WE WE NOTICED ONE OF OUR AUDITS THAT IT WASN'T ALREADY ZONED FOR INDUSTRIAL. SO WE, WE WERE JUST CLEANING UP. AS YOU CAN SEE RIGHT NOW, THERE'S A SMALL POND AND QUITE A STORMWATER POND AND QUITE A BIT OF STORAGE ON IT. SO I WOULD EXPECT A SIMILAR USES. IT'S ALSO THERE'S A PARCEL, THERE'S A LARGE BUFFER AREA ON THE ON THE EAST SIDE. I WANT TO SAY IT'S ABOUT 100 OR 200 FOOT WIDE. THAT'S IN A PERPETUAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT. SO THAT THAT ACTUALLY CREATES A NICE BUFFER FROM THAT PARCEL, THE NEXT PARCEL OVER TO THE EAST. AND THEN OF COURSE, ON THE WEST SIDE, IT'S ALREADY ZONED INDUSTRIAL. I GOTCHA. THAT'S. YEAH. THANKS, RON. THANK YOU. THIS TIME WE'LL MOVE TO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. DOES ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WANT TO SPEAK ON THIS? YES, SIR. YOUR QUESTION ISN'T IN SPEAK, BUT IS THAT BOTH PARSONS NAME, NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE? GEORGE CALLIS 213 MARLIN COURT AND MADISON, TENNESSEE. YOU'VE BEEN SWORN IN. I WAS SWORN IN. THIS IS LEGISLATIVE. IF IT WAS NECESSARY. YEAH, I'M LOCAL LANDOWNER. I'M JUST CURIOUS, IS THAT BOTH PARCELS THAT YOU HAD PULLED UP OR WAS THE 14, THREE, 11 PARCEL IT IT KNIT DOWN THE ROAD A PIECE? THIS IS THE ONLY PIECE THAT'S BEING PROPOSED FOR CHANGING. OKAY. THE LETTER I RECEIVED REFERENCED THAT THIS PARCEL AND THE 14, THREE, 11. TWO PARCEL, IT SHOULDN'T BE TOO FAR FROM THERE, BUT THERE'S NOTHING DOWN THE ROAD. OKAY, WELL, WHEN I WENT I'M NOT SAYING THIS HAPPENED, BUT IT MAY HAVE HAPPENED. SOMETIMES PARCEL ID NUMBERS WERE BROKEN OFF FROM ONE ANOTHER PIECE RIGHT THERE. DUPLICATE. RIGHT. SO. SO WE MAY HAVE GOTTEN PART OF WHAT WE DID WITH THAT WHERE WE ACTUALLY WENT OUT TO PLAY WITH IT CHANGING IT. YOU'RE PROPOSING TO CHANGE THE FROM CONSERVATION TO INDUSTRIAL. BUT WHAT I RECEIVED AND WHAT ALL THE TOOLS THAT I HAD AVAILABLE WAS GOING TO THE BAY, PA SITE IN THE 14, THREE, 11 SITE SHOWS FURTHER DOWN SANDY CREEK. WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IT DOES WITH THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED TO IT, BE REPRESENTATIVE ONLY OF THE HATCHED AREA THAT'S SHOWN THERE. YES. OKAY. SOMETIMES THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE ATTACHES ADDRESSES THAT THEY. YEAH. OKAY. AND THAT MAY BE THE THING, BECAUSE I WAS CURIOUS, YOU KNOW, WITH THERE'S NOT MUCH INFRASTRUCTURE DOWN THERE. IT'S ALL DIRT ROADS. I WAS CURIOUS TO YOU JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DIDN'T. WELL, IT'D BE GREAT IF IT WASN'T DIRT ROADS, BUT. YEAH, I JUST WAS CURIOUS ABOUT IT. SO IT'S ALL ONE PARCEL. THERE'S TWO PARCELS THERE. THERE'S ONE PIECE RIGHT HERE. THEY'RE ADJOINING EACH OTHER. OKAY. THAT WAS MY QUESTION. BLUE. THAT BLUE BOUNDARY RIGHT DOWN HERE. YES. THAT'S THAT'S WHAT'S BEING DISCUSSED AT THIS MEETING. OKAY. ANY ANY FUTURE PARCELS WOULD HAVE TO BE SUBMITTED TO US FOR BEFORE BOARD SENT OUT LETTERS. SOMETHING LIKE THAT AGAIN. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE WANT TO SPEAK ON THIS? OKAY. THIS TIME WE'LL CLOSE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND GO TO COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION. YEAH. SORRY. BEING UTILIZED. YEAH. I NEED A MOTION. A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. CHRISTIE. YES, MA'AM. MR. DAFFEN. YES, MA'AM. MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. HAYMAN. YES, MA'AM. MR. HONEYCUTT. YES, MA'AM. NEXT ITEM, ITEM NUMBER FIVE. THE COMMISSION CONDUCT A QUASI JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING. PLISZKA 20250216 TO CONSIDER REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 110 ACRES FROM CONSERVATION HABITATION TO INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES LOCATED AT ONE, 3500 AND 14311 ARLINGTON ROAD AND SANDY CREEK AREA. ANY. EX-PARTE. ANYONE? YES, SIR. STAFF PRESENTATION IAN CROWLEY. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. AS WE DISCUSSED IN THE PREVIOUS HEARING, THIS IS A SIMILAR 110 ACRES THERE. THE ZONING OF THESE TWO PIECES OF PROPERTY IS CONSERVATION, HABITATION BEING PROPOSED TO GO TO THE INDUSTRIAL TWO ZONING [00:20:02] DISTRICT. AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S ADJACENT TO THE PIECE TO THE WEST. THAT'S ALREADY AN EXISTING SHIPYARD. STAFF FEELS THAT THIS REQUEST IS CONSISTENT AND COMPATIBLE WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND OUR LAND ANDEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. I RECOMMEND THE COMMISSION THAT WE FIND THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION PLC 2025 0216 CONSISTENT WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND FOR THE RECOMMENDATION ON TO OUR BOARD TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE. HAPPY TO HELP ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS. I DON'T THINK ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS. WE'RE GOOD. THANKS, WAYNE. AT THIS TIME WE'LL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT. WOULD YOU WANT TO SPEAK? SAY ANYTHING. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO WE'LL MOVE ON TO PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WANT TO SPEAK ON THIS? HEARING? NONE. SEEING NONE. WE'LL GO TO COMMISSION DISCUSSION AND ACTION. ANYBODY? CONTINUATION? YEAH. MOVE TO APPROVE. WE GOT A MOTION A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MR. CHRISTIE. YES, MA'AM. MR. DEVIN. YES, MA'AM. MR. CARTER. YES, MA'AM. MR. HAYMAN. YES, MA'AM. MR. HONEYCUTT. YES, MA'AM. OKAY. [F. Commission Member Items] NEXT ITEM IS THE CALENDAR FOR 2026. YES. 17TH FALLS AND SPRING BREAK. AND SOMETIMES WE HAVE A PROBLEM GETTING A QUORUM. SO THE POSSIBILITY TO MOVE IT TO THE NEXT TUESDAY, MARCH 24TH IS AN OPTION. IF THAT WOULD WORK, OR YOU WANT TO LEAVE IT ON THE 17TH, TWO OF US WILL DEFINITELY BE GONE ON THE 17TH. YES, MA'AM. TO THE 24TH. MOVE IT TO THE 24TH OR KEEP IT ON THE 17TH OF MARCH. SO YEAH. I, I DON'T KNOW YET. I MIGHT NOT BE HERE ACTUALLY. OKAY. BUT IF YOU ALL ARE GONE THE WEEK BEFORE, YOU'D BE HERE FOR THE 24TH. SO JUST FOR THE RECORD, MIKE AND I WILL BE HERE. I HAVE TO HAVE THREE. I SHOULD BE HERE FOR THE 17TH. I DON'T KNOW IF I'LL BE HERE ON THE 24TH. OKAY. YEAH. SO I HAVE A BETTER SHOT. I WILL CONFIRM ON THE 24TH I THINK SO, I THINK SO, OKAY. SO DO YOU WANT ME? I'LL DO THE SCHEDULE NEXT MONTH. WE'LL DO THE CALENDAR APPROVAL FOR NEXT YEAR'S MEETINGS. AND THE CHAIR AND THE VICE CHAIR. OKAY. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMISSION MEMBER ANY ITEMS CAN I GO AHEAD AND NOMINATE YOU AS. I'M SORRY. LET'S GET IN FRONT OF IT. ALL * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.