[Code Magistrate Hearing on June 18, 2026.]
          [00:00:10]
          HAVE REVIEWED THE DOCKET. I DO NOT SEE THE BASIS FOR ANY ORDERS OF RECUSAL IN CONNECTION WITH THESE MATTERS. I'VE NOT HAD ANY EX PARTY COMMUNICATIONS. AND IF YOU ANTICIPATE GIVING TESTIMONY, IF YOU WOULD STAND AND BE SWORN. RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND. 
          SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE IS THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD. LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT THEY HAVE ANSWERED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE. OKAY. MISS ASHMAN, IF YOU WANT TO. GOOD AFTERNOON, BAY COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER. TODAY. CURRENTLY, WE HAVE ITEMS A, F, AND D PRESENT, AND WE HAVE A PHONE CALL FOR LETTER D, SO WE WILL START WITH LETTER A. THE PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 638 MALAGA PLACE. AND THIS. THIS IS A HEARING FOR COMPLIANCE. THIS IS THIS CASE WENT BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ON MAY 14TH, 2026 AND WAS FOUND IN VIOLATION OF 17-2 IN THE FORM OF UNFIT UNSAFE STRUCTURES. THE RESPONDENT DID NOT APPEAR AT THAT HEARING, STARTING WITH SLIDE NUMBER THREE. THESE ARE DATED MAY 11TH. THESE WERE PHOTOS THAT WERE PRESENTED TO YOU AT THE MAY 14TH HEARING. IT'S TWO ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. I HAVE ONE HERE ON THE LEFT SIDE AND I CAN'T TELL THERE, BUT WE HAVE ONE ON THE RIGHT SIDE. THE MAGISTRATE ORDERED THE POSTPONEMENT OF 30 DAYS TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER OR FINED $500 WOULD BE IMPOSED. ALL INCIDENTAL COSTS OF ENFORCEMENT AGAINST THE PROPERTY SHALL CONSTITUTE A LIEN ON REAL PROPERTY, WHICH THE VIOLATION EXISTED UPON ANY OTHER REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE RESPONDENT. A COPY OF THAT ORDER IS INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE AS EXHIBIT B AND CONTAINED IN THE CASE FILE. INSPECTOR SCOTT THORPE WAS ASSIGNED THE CASE AND HE IS HERE TO TESTIFY. AFTER MAGISTRATE INSPECTOR THORPE, I SUBMITTED CREDENTIALS FOR RECORD. ALL MY NOTICES AND PHOTOGRAPHS ARE ALSO SUBMITTED FOR THE CASE ON JUNE 1ST, 2026. 
          THE PROPERTY OWNER, MR. SAMUEL HANSEN, APPLIED FOR A AND OBTAINED A DEMOLITION PERMIT WAS ISSUED ON JUNE 3RD, 2026 WITH EXPIRATION DATE OF DECEMBER 3RD, 2026. TO REMOVE THE PARTIALLY COLLAPSED ACCESSORY BUILDING. COPY OF HEARING AND NOTICE WAS HAND DELIVERED TO THE PROPERTY OWNER ON APRIL 20TH, 2026 AND POSTED AT THE BAY COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER ON JUNE 3RD, 2026. ON THE 12TH OF JUNE 2026, INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED ON THE OTHER ACCESSORY BY JOSEPH BISHOPS OF FLAGLER ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING DESIGN, STATING THAT STRUCTURE IS IN GOOD CONDITION NEEDED PAINTING AND SIDING, WHICH MR. HANSEN HAS DONE. THEY WERE LIKE FOR LIKE ITEMS SO NO PERMIT WOULD NEEDED. IT WAS NOTHING STRUCTURAL ON IT. ON JUNE 15TH, INSPECTION WAS COMPLETED. THE. THE DEMOLISHED ACCESSORY IS BEING SLOWLY REMOVED AND THE PROPERTY OWNER DOES HAVE THE PERMIT VALID. HE IS HERE TODAY. 
          OKAY. THIS IS THE. YEP. THERE'S A NEW SIDING ON THERE AND HE'S GOING TO PUT SOME PAINT ON THERE. THE SOFFIT HAS BEEN FIXED AND THE FASCIA THAT WAS HANGING DOWN HAS ALSO BEEN FIXED. REAL QUICK WHAT DID YOU SAY. TELL US YOUR NAME AND GIVE US A GOOD MAILING ADDRESS. MY NAME IS SAMUEL J. HANSEN. 638 MALAGA PLACE, PANAMA CITY BEACH. OKAY. WHAT DO YOU WANT US TO KNOW, MR. HANSEN? I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT I'VE GOT. WELL, I STARTED THE SIDING ON THAT THERE, AND I'VE GOT SOME OF IT STAINED. IT DECIDED I CAN NEVER TELL WHEN IT'S GOING TO RAIN OR NOT, BUT I'LL GET THAT PAINTING DONE VERY QUICK. AND I KNEW THAT THE STRUCTURE WASN'T IN, IN, IN REALLY BAD SHAPE. I HAD SOME FELT ON IT WHEN THEY LOOKED AT IT AND SOME OF THE WIND HAD BLOWN THAT OFF. SO I'VE GONE BACK AND REWRAPPED THE THING AND I PUT THAT SIDING ON IT. SO IT SHOULD BE IN GOOD SHAPE. AND I'VE GOT THE OTHER BUILDING COLLAPSED AND A TRACTOR BACK THERE SO I CAN KEEP ON RIPPING IT APART AND GET GETTING WHAT I CAN GET OUT OF THERE. MANY TRIPS TO STEEL FIELD. WELL. MAY I ADD THAT IT WAS NOT UNTIL JUNE 12TH THAT WE WERE AWARE ABOUT THE INSPECTION. THIS REPORT WAS ALREADY WRITTEN BY THEN, SO WE HAVE TO GET IT READY FOR YOU. SO WE WILL HAVE SOME CHANGES TO OUR RECOMMENDATIONS. OKAY. WHICH BASICALLY THE CHANGE WOULD BE THAT HE DID COMPLY WITH YOUR ORDER ON MAY 14TH BY GETTING THE DEMOLITION PERMIT. AND THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE THE HEARING UNTIL THE PERMIT IS 
          [00:05:11]
FINALED FOR THE DEMOLITION. SO WHETHER IT'S IN DECEMBER OR WHEN WE. DECEMBER. BUT WHEN YOU'RE WHEN YOU'RE COMPLETE WITH ALL YOUR REPAIRS AND DEMOLITION IS TOTALLY DONE, WE'LL HAVE A FINAL HEARING ON IT. ALL RIGHT. WELL, BASED ON THE. THE WHAT ABOUT IT? FIVE I WOULD ASK THAT WE WOULD ADDRESS THAT. THEN. I THINK THE DEMO PERMIT WAS OBTAINED IN THE CORRECT AMOUNT OF TIME. IS THERE A PERMIT REQUIRED FOR THE REPAIRS. NO, NO. AND THE WALKTHROUGH WAS DONE PREVIOUSLY TO THE EXPIRATION. I JUST THINK THAT THE REPORT TOLD THE OTHER DAY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. BASED ON THE REQUEST FROM CODE ENFORCEMENT, THIS MATTER WILL BE CONTINUED UNTIL THE EXPIRATION OF THE BUILDING. THE DEMO PERMIT. THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. SO. ITEM F PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 6513 PINE DRIVE. THIS IS HEARING FOR COMPLIANCE. 
          AND I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND LET BRANDON. HE WAS THE ASSIGNED INVESTIGATOR. HE'S HERE TO TESTIFY. GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. BRANDON ERWIN, BAY COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT. I SUBMITTED MY EXHIBITS AND. COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR THE RECORD. NOTICES ARE ATTACHED TO THE REPORT. 
          CASE WENT BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE ON MAY 14TH, 2026, AND WAS FOUND IN VIOLATION OF BAY COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. CHAPTER 30 PROHIBITIONS IN THE FORM OF A PROHIBITED SIGN. THE RESPONDENT DID APPEAR AT THE HEARING. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY ARE INTRODUCED IN EVIDENCE AS EXHIBIT A AND CONTAINED IN THE CASE FILE FROM THE HEARING. SEE PHOTOS FROM MARCH 25TH. THE PROHIBITED SIGN WAS A LARGE SIGN THAT WAS PLACED ON A BASKETBALL GOAL. VIOLATED THE. CHAPTER 30 THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SIGN SIZE AND SIGN HEIGHT. THE MAGISTRATE ORDERED THAT RESPOND TO HAVE TEN DAYS TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE OR INITIAL FINE OF $200, AND A DAILY FINE OF $25 WILL BE IMPOSED FOR 20 DAYS, OR WHEN THE PROPERTY WAS BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. ALL INCIDENTAL COSTS OF ENFORCEMENT SHALL CONSTITUTE A LIEN AGAINST THE REAL PROPERTY ON WHICH THE VIOLATIONS EXISTED, AND UPON ANY OTHER REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VIOLATORS. 
          A COPY OF THE ORDER IS INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE AS EXHIBIT B AND CONTAINED IN THE CASE FILE. ON MAY 25TH, THE PROPERTY OWNER, EDWARD BATT, EMAILED ME AND ADVISED THAT THE PROPERTY OR THE SIGN HAD BEEN TAKEN DOWN AND THE PROPERTY WAS IN COMPLIANCE. HE ADVISED IT WAS TAKEN DOWN ON MAY 23RD. ON MAY 26TH, I INSPECTED THE PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTY REMAINED IN VIOLATION. SIGN WAS REMOVED FROM THE BASKETBALL GOAL, BUT IT WAS NOW PLACED AGAINST THE PROPERTY OWNER'S FENCE AND WAS STILL IN PUBLIC VIEW. MARCH OR I'M SORRY. MAY 27TH, 2026. I EMAILED MR. BATT AND EXPLAINED THAT THE SIGN WAS STILL IN VIOLATION. HE RESPONDED AND ADVISED A SIGN HAD BEEN PUT AWAY AND WAS NOW OUT OF SIGHT. MAY 28TH I REINSPECTED THE PROPERTY AND IT WAS FOUND IN COMPLIANCE. FINE CEASED AS OF THIS DATE. COPY OF THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS POSTED AT THE BAY COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER ON JUNE 3RD, 2026. ON JUNE 13TH, 2026, A COMPLAINT. WE WERE NOTIFIED FROM THE COMPLAINANT THAT A NEW SIGN HAD BEEN PLACED ON THE BASKETBALL GOAL. SO YOU SEE SLIDE 12 SIGN AND SLIDE 13. YOU CAN SEE IT VIOLATES A SIGN HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. AND THE COMPLAINANT IS HERE TO TESTIFY TO THOSE PHOTOS. AND THEN JUNE. OH SORRY MR. GOOCH. I'M JUST SAYING FOR THE RECORD. OH, FOR THE RECORD, HE'S HERE TO TESTIFY TO THE PHOTO. SORRY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. AND ON JUNE 15TH, WE CONDUCT OUR OFFICE, CONDUCTED AN INSPECTION AND VERIFIED THAT THE SIGN WAS VIOLATING THE SIGN HEIGHT AND WAS, IN FACT, IN PLACE. OKAY. MR. BAT. YES, SIR. DO YOU HAVE 
          [00:10:03]
ANYTHING TO SAY? DO YOU WANT TO RESPOND? YEAH, SURE. COME ON UP HERE. TELL US YOUR NAME AND GIVE US YOUR MAILING ADDRESS. EDDIE BATTS, 6513 PINE DRIVE. WHAT DO YOU WANT US TO KNOW? I DON'T SEE ANY SIGN. I SEE SOME ARTWORK DONE BY MY DAUGHTER THAT'S AFFIXED TO A BASKETBALL GOAL. AND I THINK ARTWORK IS ACTUALLY EXCLUDED FROM BEING LABELED AS. I'M NOT GOING TO PLAY GAMES WITH YOU. OKAY. I'M NOT PLAYING A GAME, SIR. OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE? I THINK THE ARTWORK IS VERY NICE. ANYTHING ELSE? NO, SIR. HAVE A SEAT. THANKS. MR. GAUGER. YES, SIR. 
          WHAT DO YOU WANT US TO KNOW? YES, SIR. I JUST WANTED YOU TO KNOW THAT THIS SIGN IS ILLEGAL. 
          SIGN BUSINESS BY MR. BAD IS JUST GETTING TO BE RIDICULOUS. YOU KNOW, $400,000 HOUSE. IT MAY NOT BE A LOT TO SOME PEOPLE, BUT IT'S A LOT TO ME. AND FOR HIM TO BE PLAYING THESE GAMES WITH THESE ILLEGAL SIGNS IS RIDICULOUS. I'VE DONE EVERYTHING IN THE COUNTY ASKED ME TO DO, AND I WOULD JUST APPRECIATE IF ANY, ANY KIND OF FINES OR ANYTHING RESTRICTIONS CAN BE PUT ON THIS. MAN. I CERTAINLY WOULD APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU SIR. YES, SIR. 
          ANYTHING ELSE FROM CODE ENFORCEMENT? NO. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I WILL SAY JUST MR. LEWIS, THIS IS NOT ABOUT WHAT'S ON THE SIGN. IT'S ABOUT THE SIZE OF THE SIGN, WHICH WE CAN'T MEASURE. IT'S OBVIOUSLY ABOVE THREE FEET. HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO MEASURE THE ACTUAL SIZE OF THE. IT'S A YARD SALE SIGN. OKAY, SO IT'S UNDER IT'S UNDERSIZED. MR. BAT, DON'T BE SPEAKING FROM THE AUDIENCE. I THINK THE ORDINANCE READS TWO TWO BY ONE, TWO BY THREE, TWO BY THREE, BY THREE. THANK YOU, MR. BAT. I'M NOT GOING TO TELL YOU AGAIN. TRY AGAIN. OKAY. 
          BASED ON THE TESTIMONY THAT I'VE HEARD AND THE PHOTOGRAPHS I'VE SEEN INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT THE RESPONDENT WAS GIVEN ADEQUATE TIME TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS. HE FAILED TO DO SO IN A TIMELY FASHION. THE INITIAL FINE OF $200 IS IMPOSED, AND A DAILY FINE OF $25 FOR A PERIOD OF THREE DAYS IS ALSO IMPOSED. THAT SUM OF $275 SHALL DRAW INTEREST AT THE STATUTORY RATE FROM THE DATE OF RECORDING. THE PRESENT SITUATION. SAYS THAT THE PROPERTY IS STILL NOT IN OR IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE AT THE PRESENT TIME. THAT STARTED ON JUNE 13TH. AND THE DAILY FINE WILL ALSO CONTINUE AT $25 PER DAY BEGINNING JUNE 13TH UNTIL THE PROPERTY IS BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE. UPON THE RECORDING OF THIS ORDER IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BAY COUNTY, THE COST LEVIED AGAINST THE RESPONDENT WILL CONSTITUTE A LIEN ON THE LAND ON WHICH THE VIOLATIONS OCCURRED, AND AGAINST ANY OTHER REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE RESPONDENT. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IS ENTITLED TO ASSESS THESE COSTS BY VIRTUE OF THE UNIFORM ASSESSMENT COLLECTION ACT AND CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE THAT WILL CONCLUDE THIS HEARING. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU SIR. ALL RIGHT. ITEM G PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 1504 TROUT LANE. ALSO, A HEARING FOR COMPLIANCE. AND INVESTIGATOR SCOTT THORPE IS HERE TO TESTIFY. GOOD AFTERNOON AGAIN. MAGISTRATE INSPECTOR THORPE. 
          THIS CASE WENT BEFORE A SPECIAL MAGISTRATE OF BAY COUNTY ON MAY 14TH, 2026. IT WAS FOUND IN VIOLATION OF BAY COUNTY CODE SECTION 17-2 AND FOR UNFIT UNSAFE STRUCTURE. THE RESPONDENT DID NOT APPEAR AT THE HEARING. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY ARE INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE AS EXHIBIT A AND CONTAINED IN THE CASE FILE. THE MAGISTRATE ORDERED THAT THE RESPONDENT HAVE 30 DAYS TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER OR A FINE OF $1,000 BE IMPOSED. ALL INCIDENTAL COSTS OF ENFORCEMENT SHALL CONSTANTLY LEAN AGAINST REAL PROPERTY IN WHICH THE 
          [00:15:01]
VIOLATION EXISTS, AND UPON ANY OTHER REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE RESPONDENT. A COPY OF THE ORDER IS INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE AS EXHIBIT B AND CONTAINED IN THE CASE FILE. ON MAY 29TH, 2026, AN EMAIL WAS RECEIVED FROM VANESSA SLOUGH ROGERS, AN ATTORNEY WITH THE MORTGAGE MORTGAGEE, ASKING FOR DETAILS FROM THE HEARING. INVESTIGATOR JAMES RESPONDED TO THE HEARING DETAILS AND RETURNED THE EMAIL WITH THE FIRST ORDER AND A NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOTICE OF HEARING LETTER. ON JUNE 15TH, THE INSPECTION WAS COMPLETED AND THE PROPERTY REMAINED IN VIOLATION. COPY OF NOTICE HEARING WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY ON APRIL 27TH, 2026 AND AT THE BAY COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER ON JUNE 3RD, 2026. AS OF THIS DATE OF OF THE HEARING, NO ENGINEERING APPLICATION FOR PERMITS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED, AND A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THAT MORTGAGE COMPANY IS HERE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. COME FORWARD PLEASE, MA'AM. GOOD AFTERNOON. GOOD AFTERNOON. 
          IF YOU WOULD TELL US YOUR NAME. YES. AND YOUR BAR NUMBER AND YOUR PROFESSIONAL ADDRESS? YES. 
          MY NAME IS MONICA DARROW, THAT'S SPELLED DARROW. MY FLORIDA BAR NUMBER IS 84114. MY OFFICE ADDRESS IS 6409 CONGRESS AVENUE, SUITE 100, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA, 33487. CAME ALL THE WAY UP FROM BOCA, I DID NOT. MY OFFICE IS IN BOCA. I WORK WITH MISTER ROGERS, BUT I AM ACTUALLY HERE IN BAY COUNTY. SO NO, I DID NOT DRIVE FOR YOU. THAT WOULD BE QUITE A HIKE, WOULDN'T IT? WHAT DO YOU WANT US TO KNOW? WE ARE REALLY JUST HERE TO MONITOR. WE WERE HOPING THAT MISTER HEY WOULD BE HERE. AND THAT'S REALLY IT. SO. OKAY. I SPOKE WITH SCOTT SCOTT, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT HE'S GOING TO RECOMMEND DEMOLITION. AND LIKE I SAID, WE'RE JUST REALLY HERE TO MONITOR, SO. OKAY. WELL, IN LIGHT OF THE FACT IT LOOKS PRETTY ROUGH. AND SO I'M GOING TO, I'M GOING TO IN FACT, ORDER THAT. SO I'M GOING TO FIND THAT THE. WELL, FIRST I'LL FIND THAT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1504 TROUT LANE IN PANAMA CITY BEACH, IS WITHIN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF BAY COUNTY AND SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 17 OF THE CODE, THAT THERE IS A. 
          WELL, I'VE ALREADY FOUND THAT. I GUESS THAT IT'S IN VIOLATION, AND THAT. HAS THE RESPONDENT BEEN GIVEN ADEQUATE TIME TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE AND HAS FAILED TO DO SO? AND BASED ON THAT, CODE ENFORCEMENT STAFF OR ANY CONTRACTOR HIRED BY THE COUNTY SHOULD BE AUTHORIZED TO ENTER UPON THE PREMISES, DEMOLISH THE UNFIT OR UNSAFE STRUCTURE AND REMOVE ANY AND ALL OF THE DEMOLITION DEBRIS FROM THAT ACTION AND FROM THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED IN THE ORDER OF THE 14TH. THE ISSUE OF THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT AND ANY FINES WILL BE ADDRESSED AT A FINAL HEARING AND UPON THE RECORDING OF THIS ORDER IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BAY COUNTY, THE COST LEVIED AGAINST THE RESPONDENT WILL BE A LIEN ON THE LAND ON WHICH THE VIOLATIONS OCCURRED, AND AGAINST ANY OTHER REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE RESPONDENT HERE IN BAY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IS ENTITLED TO COLLECT THESE FEES BY VIRTUE OF THE UNIFORM ASSESSMENT COLLECTION ACT. IN CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE. 1 OR 2 QUICK QUESTIONS IF IT PLEASES, YOUR HONOR. FIRST, DO WE HAVE A DATE? DO WE KNOW THE DATE OF THAT FINAL HEARING? FOR THE FINAL ASSESSMENT? IT WILL BE AFTER THE DEMOLITION. OKAY. THE PROPERTY IS CLEANED AND SPICE AND THE DEMOLITION WILL OCCUR NO SOONER THAN 30 DAYS. CORRECT. 
          JUST SO WELL THAT THEY HAVE TO DO SOME STEPS AND EVERYTHING ABOUT GETTING SOMEBODY TO GO OUT AND BID IT AND LOOK AT IT. IS THIS A THIS WILL REQUIRE AN ASBESTOS INSPECTION TO. AND I SENT IT TO PICTURES, JUST PRELIMINARY TO THEM. AND THEY THEY SAID THAT THERE'S ENOUGH OVER HERE THAT THEY CAN DO AN ASSESSMENT. SO IF IT WAS COMPLETELY ON THE GROUND, THEY COULD STILL DO IT. THEY WOULDN'T FIND ANYTHING. BUT THERE. SO WE DON'T GET ANY TROUBLE FROM THE DP0I ABSOLUTELY DON'T WANT THAT. AND AND NEXT WEEK I'M SORRY. AND THEN WE'LL DO IT. GO AHEAD WITH THE ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR THE ACTUAL DEMOLITION. THE FINAL DEMOLITION WILL NOT OCCUR WITHIN THE 30 DAYS. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I TELL MY CLIENT THE TIMELINE. SO WHAT TO EXPECT? JUST TELL THEM WE'RE JUMPING THROUGH HOOPS. UNDERSTOOD. OKAY. 
          ALL RIGHT. CAN YOU EMAIL ME? I CAN SEND YOU A COPY OF THIS ORDER VIA EMAIL. PERFECT. OR WHATEVER YOU WANT. ABSOLUTELY. I'LL SEND YOU AN EMAIL. EVERYBODY IN THE LOOP. YEAH. 
          I'LL SEND YOU AN EMAIL, THINGS LIKE THAT. ANY QUESTIONS? SHOOT IT TO ME. ASK ME. YEAH, YEAH. 
          OUR CLIENT'S JUST GOING TO WANT TO KNOW THE TIMELINE. LIKE WHEN DO YOU EXPECT THE PROPERTY WILL BE DEMOLISHED AND EVERYTHING. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WELL, THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. HAVE A GOOD DAY. I'LL KEEP YOU IN THE LOOP WITH EVERYTHING. OKAY? ITEM D IS A TELEPHONE CALL. 
          PROPER ADDRESS IS 2430 EAST 17TH STREET. AND THIS IS ALSO A HEARING FOR COMPLIANCE. 
          [00:20:37]
YOUR CALL CANNOT BE COMPLETED AS DIALED. I THINK IT'S THE OPERATOR. PROBABLY IS. 
          THE VOICEMAIL IN MILTON WITH EASTERN METAL SUPPLY. SORRY I MISSED YOUR CALL. PLEASE LEAVE A NAME, NUMBER AND A BRIEF MESSAGE. TRY ONE MORE TIME, BUT THEN WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. NINE. SIX. YOUR CALL CANNOT BE COMPLETED AS DIALED. PLEASE CONSULT YOUR DIRECT. CAN'T MAKE IT, GARRETT SAID THAT HAPPENS SOMETIMES. DO WE HAVE. THIS IS KELLY. KELLY, THIS IS JODY WITH THE BAY COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT. YOU'RE CURRENTLY IN THE MAGISTRATE HEARING. I NEED TO GO AHEAD AND SWEAR YOU IN. OKAY. DO YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO RECEIVE, THE TESTIMONY YOU'RE ABOUT TO GIVE, IS THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD? I DO, ALL RIGHT. THE CODE ENFORCEMENT AND THE MAGISTRATE ARE GOING TO SPEAK NEXT. MA'AM, WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO IS WE'RE GOING TO HEAR FROM THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER AS TO WHAT HE HAS FOUND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS CASE. AT THAT POINT, YOU'LL BE AFFORDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO ASK HIM QUESTIONS. OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, JUST OFFER TESTIMONY ON YOUR OWN BEHALF. 
          SO WE'LL GO FROM THERE, OKAY? OKAY. THANK YOU. HEY, MISS WALKER, THIS IS ROBERT. YOU CAN HEAR ME? I CAN. OKAY. MR. ROBERT CLARKSON, BAY COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT. I'VE SUBMITTED MY MY REPORT AND PHOTOS FOR THIS PROPERTY. THIS CASE WENT BEFORE THE SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FOR BAY COUNTY ON MAY 14TH, 2026, AND WAS FOUND IN VIOLATION BAY COUNTY CODE SECTION 172 IN THE FORM OF JUNK AND DERELICT VEHICLES. RESPONDENT DID APPEAR AT THE HEARING. PHOTOGRAPHS WERE INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE EXHIBIT A AND CONTAINED IN THE FILE. THIS PHOTOGRAPHS HERE IS IS FROM THE PRE HEARING INSPECTION ON MAY THE 11TH SEEDED. THERE WERE TWO DERELICT VEHICLES IN THE BACKGROUND AND JUNK AND DEBRIS PILE THERE ON THE FRONT. THE MAGISTRATE ORDERED. THIS PART HAS TEN DAYS TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE OR INITIAL FINE OF $100, AND A DAILY FINE OF $15 TO BE IMPOSED FOR 20 DAYS, OR WHEN THE PROPERTY IS BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. ALL INCIDENTAL COSTS OF THE ENFORCEMENT SHALL CONSTITUTE A LIEN AGAINST THE REAL PROPERTY ON WHICH THE VIOLATIONS EXISTED, AND UPON ANY OTHER REAL PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VIOLATORS. 
          A COPY OF THE ORDER WAS INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE AS EXHIBIT B, MAY 26TH. I REINSPECTED THE PROPERTY. THE JUNK AND DEBRIS HAD BEEN REMOVED. HOWEVER, THE ONE DERELICT VEHICLE REMAINED. THEY ONLY HAD TO REMOVE ONE OF THEM, SO THE VEHICLES DID REMAIN. I WAS IN CONTACT WITH MISS WALKER LATER THAT DAY, SHE SAYS. THEY HAVE A TOW TRUCK COMING IN THE MORNING. THE NEXT DAY THE TOW TRUCK CAME AND THAT'S WHEN THAT RAINSTORM HIT AND THE TOW TRUCK GOT STUCK. AND DUE TO THE HEAVY RAIN FOR 2 OR 3 DAYS, IT WAS NOT ABLE TO COME BACK OUT. CAME OUT ON JUNE THE 2ND AND REMOVED THE VEHICLE I DROVE. SHE CALLED ME AND LET ME KNOW IT WAS REMOVED. I DROVE BY ON THE THIRD AND VERIFIED THAT THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN REMOVED. SO AT THAT TIME THE PROPERTY WAS IN COMPLIANCE. HE WAS THE. ORIGINALLY POSTED FOR THIS HEARING ON APRIL THE 29TH. COMPLIANCE HEARING WAS POSTED THEN AND IT WAS POSTED ON THE GOVERNMENT WEBSITE ON JUNE THE 3RD. I. SHE DID CALL ME TODAY AND WAS UNABLE TO ATTEND IN 
          [00:25:06]
PERSON AND WISHED TO ATTEND OVER THE PHONE. HELPING RELIEVE THE FINES AND AT THAT POINT I HAVE NO FURTHER TESTIMONY. OKAY, SO THE THE VEHICLE IS NOW GONE. YES. AND AND HONESTLY, IT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN GONE PROBABLY EARLIER, TEN DAYS. I THINK THE WEATHER KIND OF MESSED WITH THEM ON IT, BUT THEY GOT A DUMPSTER THERE AND GOT THE OTHER STUFF OFF VERY QUICKLY. 
          OKAY, OKAY. BASED ON THE TESTIMONY I'VE HEARD. OH, EXCUSE ME, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER? I DO NOT. THANK YOU. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO SAY IN CONNECTION WITH THIS MATTER? I THINK MR. MR. CLARKSON COVERED IT VERY WELL. 
          I WAS VERY STRESSED ABOUT THE THE DELAY OF THE TOW TRUCK DRIVER AND THE RAIN, BUT WE WE WERE ABLE TO GET IT ACCOMPLISHED. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WELL, BASED ON THE TESTIMONY THAT I'VE HEARD AND THE PHOTOGRAPHS I'VE SEEN INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOW IN COMPLIANCE AND THAT. FINES ARE WAIVED. THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. I WILL CLOSE THE CASE. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. BYE BYE. ALL RIGHT. I THINK THAT CONCLUDES ALL THE ITEMS THAT ARE PRESENT. OUR PHONE CALL, AM I CORRECT, JODY? YES. OKAY. SO WE WILL GO BACK TO ITEM B. PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 9906 INDIAN BLUFF ROAD. ALSO, A HEARING FOR NON COMPLIANCE. AND INSPECTOR THORPE IS HERE TO TESTIFY. AGAIN. INSPECTOR THORPE THIS CASE WENT BEFORE A SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FOR BAY COUNTY ON MAY 14TH, 2026 AND WAS FOUND IN VIOLATION BAY COUNTY CODE SECTION 17-2 IN THE FORM OF AN UNFIT UNSAFE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, OVERGROWTH, TRASH AND JUNK. THE RESPONDENT DID NOT APPEAR AT THE HEARING. THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY ARE INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE AS EXHIBIT A CONTAINED IN THE CASE FILE. THE MAGISTRATE ORDERED THAT THE RESPONDENT HAVE 30 DAYS TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER, OR A $1,000 FINE WILL BE IMPOSED. ALL INCIDENTAL COSTS OF ENFORCEMENT SHALL CONSTITUTE A LIEN AGAINST THE REAL PROPERTY IN WHICH THE VIOLATION EXISTS, AND UPON ANY OTHER REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE RESPONDENT. A COPY OF THE ORDER IS INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE AS EXHIBIT B AND CONTAINED IN A CASE FILE C, A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE DAMAGE, ACCESSORY OVERGROWTH, TRASH AND JUNK WAS ON THE PORCH ON JUNE 15TH. INSPECTION WAS COMPLETED AND THE PROPERTY REMAINED IN VIOLATION. THE ITEMS ON THE FRONT PORCH HAVE BEEN REMOVED. 
          THE GRASS WAS CUT ONCE BUT IS NOW ABOUT KNEE HIGH AGAIN, AND THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IS STILL REMAINS IN THIS CONDITION AND AS UNFIT UNSAFE. A COPY OF THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY ON MARCH 19TH, 2026 AND AT THE BAY COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER ON JUNE 3RD, 2026 AS THIS DATE OF HEARING, NO ENGINEERING OR APPLICATION FOR PERMITS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. OKAY, NO COMMUNICATION BASED ON THE TESTIMONY I'VE HEARD AND THE EXHIBITS I'VE SEEN IN THE FORM OF PHOTOGRAPHS, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT THE RESPONDENT WAS GIVEN ADEQUATE TIME TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS, FAILED TO DO SO. I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND IMPOSE THE FINE TODAY OF $1,000, AND I'M GOING TO AUTHORIZE CODE ENFORCEMENT OR ANY CONTRACTOR HIRED BY THE COUNTY TO ENTER UPON THE PREMISES AND ABATE THE VIOLATIONS FOUND TO EXIST UPON SUCH ENTRY. THAT INCLUDES REMOVING OVERGROWTH, TRASH, JUNK, AND THE UNSAFE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IDENTIFIED IN THE PREVIOUS ORDER. ALL THE. COST RELATED TO THE ABATEMENT PROCESS WILL BE ADDRESSED AT THE FINAL HEARING. WE'LL JUST GO AHEAD AND ADDRESS THE FINE AT THAT POINT. ALSO, I'LL JUST WAIT ON THE FINE, BUT KEEP YOU FROM HAVING TO ENTER A SEPARATE ORDER ON THE RECORDING OF THE ORDER AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 
          BAY COUNTY THE COST LEVIED AGAINST THE RESPONDENT WILL BE A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY. 
          OWNED BY THE RESPONDENT. HERE IN BAY COUNTY. THE COUNTY COMMISSIONER IS ENTITLED TO COLLECT THESE COSTS BY VIRTUE OF THE UNIFORM ASSESSMENT COLLECTION ACT AND CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE. ITEM C PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 3901 WEST 26TH STREET. ALSO, A HEARING FOR 
          [00:30:07]
COMPLIANCE AND INSPECTOR OR INVESTIGATOR TO TESTIFY. GOOD AFTERNOON, ROBERT CLARKSON, BAY COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT. I'VE SUBMITTED MY REPORT AND EXHIBITS FOR THIS CASE. THIS CASE WENT BEFORE YOU ON MAY 14TH AND WAS FOUND IN VIOLATION OF BAY COUNTY CODE SECTION 172, IN THE FORM OF DERELICT VEHICLES, VESSELS, OVERGROWTH, JUNK AND UNSCREENED UNUSED PERSONAL PROPERTY. THE RESPONDENT DID APPEAR AT THE HEARING AND PHOTOGRAPHS WERE INTRODUCED AS EXHIBIT A. THESE ARE THE PHOTOGRAPHS THAT WERE TAKEN PRIOR TO THE INITIAL HEARING ON MAY 14TH. THESE WERE TAKEN ON THE 11TH. HE HAD SEVERAL BOATS AND JUNK AND DEBRIS AND VEHICLES THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY. THE MAGISTRATE ORDERED THAT THE RESPONDENT HAS TEN DAYS TO THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE OR INITIAL FINE OF $200, AND A DAILY FINE OF $25 TO BE IMPOSED FOR 20 DAYS, OR WHEN THE PROPERTY IS BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. ALL CALLS FOR ENFORCEMENT SHALL CONSTITUTE A LIEN AGAINST THE REAL PROPERTY ON WHICH THE VIOLATIONS EXISTED, AND UPON ANY REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VIOLATORS. 
          A COPY OF THE ORDER IS INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE. EXHIBIT B COPY OF THE ORDER AND THIS NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE HEARING WAS SENT CERTIFIED AND REGULAR MAIL TO THE RESPONDENT, AND HE RECEIVED IT ON MAY 18TH. THE REGULAR MAIL HAS NOT RETURNED. ON MAY 26TH, I WENT AND INSPECTED THE PROPERTY. THIS IS WORKING THE WAY AROUND PROPERTIES THERE ON THE CORNER. 
          VEHICLES THERE AND THEY APPEAR TO BE TAGGED CURRENT TAGS. YOU WORK AROUND TO THE SHOP. 
          THERE'S STILL A BUNCH OF TRASH AND DEBRIS IN THE BACK AND. THE CLOSE UP VIEW OF THE TRASH AND DEBRIS. THOSE VESSELS AT THE TIME DIDN'T HAVE ANY STICKERS ON THEM. AND A LITTLE BIT OVERGROWTH. JUNE 9TH. LET ME BACK UP. THE PROPERTY WAS POSTED ON APRIL 29TH FOR THIS HEARING, AND IT WAS POSTED ON THE GOVERNMENT WEBSITE ON JUNE 3RD. JUNE 9TH. I JUST HAPPEN TO BE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND INSPECTED. THE PROPERTY STILL REMAINED IN VIOLATION. ON THE BACK. THERE'S NOW APPLIANCES UP FRONT. A LOT OF TIRES AND STUFF IN THE CORNER. JUNE 15TH RE-INSPECTED THE PROPERTY FOR THIS HEARING OVERGROWTH IS OBVIOUSLY RETURNING. PRETTY MUCH THE SAME CONDITION. THE APPLIANCE STILL IN THE CORNER. STILL THE DERELICT VESSELS AND THE JUNK AND DEBRIS THERE IN FRONT OF THE GARAGE. THIS MORNING, MID MORNING, I RECEIVED A PHONE CALL FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER'S SON WHO ALSO APPEARED THAT DAY. HUNTER BILL HUNTER CALLED TO SAY THAT THAT HE WAS WOULD HAVE THE PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE AND ASKED ME TO COME BY. SO I DID GO BY THERE MID-MORNING. I CAN SAY THAT THAT ALL THE TRAILERS AND VESSELS ARE AND VEHICLES HAVE CURRENT TAGS. HE DOES HAVE ONE DERELICT VESSEL ON THE PROPERTY THAT HE CAN HAVE. EVERYONE, ALL THE REST OF THEM ARE ARE IN COMPLIANCE AND OPERABLE. WHILE I WAS THERE, HE PICKED UP AND REMOVED THE APPLIANCES AND HAD A TRUCK THERE, PICKING UP THE TIRES AND DEBRIS THAT WERE IN FRONT OF THE THE GARAGE. AND HE WAS ON A RIDING LAWNMOWER, CUTTING THE GRASS. SO I DEEMED THE PROPERTY TO BE IN COMPLIANCE. AT ABOUT 1030 THIS MORNING. OKAY. THAT'S HIS DERELICT. SO. I THINK WE CAN AMEND SECTION TWO. IS THERE 
          [00:35:06]
ANYTHING TO DO? NO, SIR. WELL, AND TO FIND IF THERE'S AN ADDITIONAL VIOLATION, THAT IT WILL BE A REPEAT, REPEAT, REPEAT. VIOLATION. OKAY. BASED ON THE TESTIMONY I'VE HEARD IN THE PHOTOGRAPHS I'VE SEEN INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT THE WAS THE SUBJECT WAS GIVEN AN ADEQUATE TIME TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE, FAILED TO DO IT IN A TIMELY FASHION, AND THEREFORE FINDING THE AMOUNT OF $700 WILL BE IMPOSED. ADDITIONALLY, ANY FURTHER VIOLATIONS ON THIS PARCEL SHALL CONSTITUTE A REPEAT VIOLATION SHOULD THEY OCCUR AS OF TODAY'S DATE, JUNE THE 18TH, THE PROPERTY IS IN COMPLIANCE AND NO FURTHER SANCTIONS WILL BE IMPOSED AT THIS POINT. ALL RIGHT, ALL RIGHT. THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM E. 
          THERE IS NO INVESTIGATIVE REPORT ON THIS ONE AS THEY DID COMPLY WITH YOUR ORDER WITHIN THE TIME FRAMES. HE HAD TO REPAIR THE SOFFIT. IT WAS BLIGHTED. THAT'S JUST A PHOTO OF IT HANGING THERE FROM THE APRIL 30TH FROM APRIL 13TH HEARING, HE DID APPLY PERMITS AND OBTAIN PERMITS. HE REPAIRED THE SOFFIT AND THE PROPERTY WAS FOUND IN COMPLIANCE WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD ON MAY 18TH. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. BASED ON THE TESTIMONY THAT I'VE HEARD, I'M GOING TO FIND THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3120 EAST 13TH COURT, HAS BEEN. IS THAT IT? YES. HAS BEEN BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE. AND THIS CASE SHALL BE CLOSED. OKAY. ITEM H, 3111 F STREET. 
          HEARING FOR NONCOMPLIANCE. AND INSPECTOR THORP IS HERE TO TESTIFY. GOOD AFTERNOON AGAIN, INSPECTOR THORP. THIS CASE WENT BEFORE A SPECIAL MAGISTRATE FOR BAY COUNTY IN APRIL 9TH, 2026. 
          IT WAS FOUND IN VIOLATION OF BAY COUNTY CODE SECTION 17-2 AND A FORM UNFIT UNSAFE STRUCTURES REPEAT VIOLATION OF JUNK TRASH DEBRIS DERELICT VEHICLES THE RESPONDENT DID APPEAR AT THE HEARING. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE AS EXHIBIT A CONTAINED IN A CASE FILE. THESE ARE DURING THE INITIAL INSPECTION WITH INVESTIGATOR CLARKSON OF THE STRUCTURES. HE'S GOT ABOUT FOUR ACCESSORIES ON THERE. THAT ONE HAD SOME FIRE DAMAGE, JUNK TRASH EVERYWHERE. THE MAGISTRATE ORDERED THAT RESPONDENT HAVE 60 DAYS TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER, OR A FINE OF $500 BE IMPOSED ON ALL INCIDENTAL COSTS OF ENFORCEMENT SHALL CONSTITUTE A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY ON WHICH THE VIOLATION EXISTS, AND UPON ANY OTHER REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE RESPONDENT. A COPY OF THE ORDER IS INTRODUCED IN EVIDENCE EXHIBIT B CONTAINED IN THE CASE FILE. THESE ARE ONGOING PHOTOGRAPHS FROM NEIGHBORING PROPERTY THAT WERE COMPLAINANTS. THIS IS FROM THE BACKYARD. DURING INSPECTION, THERE'S A DEER BOX, TRUCK AND JUNK AND TRASH EVERYWHERE. AND HE ADDED ON TO THE CARPORT. ON JUNE 15TH, INSPECTION WAS COMPLETED AND THE PROPERTY REMAINED IN VIOLATION. THIS IS APPROACHING THE ROAD. THE U-HAUL TRUCK IS STILL THERE. 
          YOU CAN SEE THE TWO ACCESSORIES IN THE BACK. THE FRONT ACCESSORY HE'S NOW BOARDED OVER THE FRONT TOOK TAKEN THE TARP OFF IT. HE HAS A CANOPY IN THE FRONT YARD THERE, WHICH IS FINE. 
          HIS VEHICLE IS UNDER IT, BUT YOU CAN SEE THE AMOUNT OF TRASH AND JUNK HE HAS STILL SCATTERED AROUND THE PROPERTY. THE STRUCTURE IN THE BACK HE'S ADDED A WALL TO THAT'S CONNECTED TO THE HOUSE NOW, AND HE HAS POWER GOING TO IT. THERE'S THE FRONT YARD LOOKING IN. WE HAVE OVERGROWTH NOW AND THERE'S A SIDE YARD. HE DID ATTEMPT TO REMOVE SOME THINGS, BUT SOME WERE PUSHED TO THE BACK YARD. AND NOW THERE'S A BIG DEBRIS PILE IN THE FRONT AND A DITCH BLOCKING DRAINAGE. A COPY OF THOSE HEARINGS WAS POSTED AT THE BAY COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER ON JUNE 3RD, 2026. AS OF THIS DATE OF HEARING, NO ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. OKAY. BASED ON THE TESTIMONY I'VE HEARD, I'M GOING TO FIND THAT THE RESPONDENT WAS GIVEN AN ADEQUATE TIME TO CORRECT THE VIOLATIONS AND FAILED TO DO SO PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE ORDER OF APRIL THE 9TH. CODE ENFORCEMENT IS THEREFORE AUTHORIZED EITHER INDIVIDUALLY OR THROUGH THE CONTRACTOR, ANY CONTRACTOR HIRED BY THE COUNTY TO ENTER UPON THE PREMISES AND REMOVE THE UNFIT OR UNSAFE STRUCTURES, JUNK, TRASH, DEBRIS AND ALL BUT ONE DERELICT VEHICLE, AS MAY BE 
          [00:40:08]
IDENTIFIED IN THE ORDER OF APRIL THE 9TH, I FIND THAT THERE. THAT THIS. PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS ORDER ENTERED THAT THE OFFENDER IS A REPEAT OFFENDER AND THE MATTERS OF THE COST OF ABATEMENT AND THE FINAL FINE WILL BE THE SUBJECT OF A ANOTHER HEARING. WHEN WE GET THOSE SUMS IN THE RECORDING OF THIS ORDER IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BAY COUNTY, THE COSTS LEVIED AGAINST THE RESPONDENT WILL BE A LIEN ON THE LAND ON WHICH THE VIOLATIONS OCCURRED, AND AGAINST ANY OTHER REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE RESPONDENT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IS ENTITLED TO COLLECT THIS BY VIRTUE OF THE UNIFORM ASSESSMENT COLLECTION ACT AND CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE. ANYTHING ELSE? I DON'T BELIEVE SO. JODY. DID I MISS ANYTHING? I THINK WE'RE GOOD. OKAY. WE'RE GOOD. I'M GOING TO RUN AND COME BACK. I'M GOING TO TRY AND GO TO A FUNERAL AND DOWN THE STREET, AND I'LL BE BACK TO SIGN THE ORDERS AFTER THAT MEET
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.